|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
Data:2009-12-12 2:34
On thinking ability, which is so far the difference between man and other animals, where, according to current scientific research, even the most intelligent animals, which is also the great apes, or dolphins do not have the thinking ability. Of course, the development and survival of human society is also manifested by thinking, and can say that each person's way of thinking are different, so I decided to everyone's different ways to look at problems, but also the ability to determine the so-called size. Can be said that all human behavior and behavior are all thinking of the consequences of the final decision. Thinking can also be a group of individuals, and for the same thing a judge, from the probability of groupthink than individual thinking in terms of the safety factor should be much higher. If we say that the stock market as a research professional body, you absolutely can determine it is the body of one of the most complex research.
The stock market is not only a complex market place, but also the wisdom of flying a comprehensive reflection of its previous place. When we are in one of the time, is a competition against the wisdom of the process. I kind of intelligence as a product of thinking, then that is the process of competition against the wisdom that is constantly thinking of the collision process. So as to participate in this market, the two main components, namely, individual thinking and the main ideas (see also add here also involves the other two kinds of thinking that the multi-party thinking, thinking and empty because the two sides of thinking can exist at any time , again in constant transformation, in this not do more analysis.) referred to here is defined as the retail operation of the 5 million below the amount of funding, this figure is the capacity of the as the market continued to rise. Although more than 5 million can not be called main, but here consideration is speed control and out of funds already different, so here divided into the main force of a uniform.
Now we come to analyze the main points in common between the first thinking produced the theme is human, no matter what the ultimate decision-making and operation of the main people to operate them are, of course, along with advances in technology may be assisted in some complicated computing systems, there is not as the main analysis. This can be regarded as one thing in common; Secondly, and note its a top, that is the common weakness which is also the main there are two points that each of us there, that is, greed and fear. Cultivation of these two weaknesses can be said that a crucial moment in the depth of people will be embodied in only a reflection of the manner and matter was dealt with on different timetables. In fact, these two things in common we need to analyze attention. After analyzing common ground, let us look at the differences between the areas, analyzing the following points down about one. With information asymmetry; individual investors have the information and the main information in the possession regardless of time or the stock from both the a priority and reliability to determine the next step of the analysis of different thinking. 2. Of group and individual nature; individual is often one person or two people to make thinking analysis, but is often the main way of thinking to make a group decision-making. This is what we usually say the operator has knowledge of the amount of asymmetry. The operation of the main decision makers in general have a high expertise. 3. Initiative and passive; individual to make decisions is largely passive, while the main tend to have a lot of money or chips, often take the initiative to make decisions. The difference is also the amount of capital ownership. Can be divided into the above three points, not hard to see from the above individual differences in thinking and the main thought, the difference there is obviously strong and weak characteristics. So to be reflected in the market clearly is an imbalance in the process of thinking game. We say that anything larger in the case of unequal confrontation, but also without power conversion process, when analyzed from the probability of strong will is better than the weak. So it's not hard to see why most of our retail market experiencing a procedure are slowly be destroyed.
Generally speaking, we have analyzed the existence of a thing when it is often want to change its operational status, or thinking of ways to solve these unfavorable factors. Then for the apparent strength of the stock market situation of inequality, we can not go to change its operational status, um, actually the answer is affirmative, that is not completely change, but you can optimize it, it would be like we have the same biological chain in nature. Going to protect the chain each one, not to undermine it or destroy it. Well, since can not change, we need to adverse factors including the weak in the favorable factors found to be more conducive to their long-term survival of
