|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
Data:2009-12-12 2:34
Old sand fought in the stock market for nearly 10 years, there are two issues have been to ask, but did not know and asked which department do not know who will be able to be answered.
I have been thinking about why the wide medium and small investors (including large) "a purchase on the sets of a sell, up"? Among these operations in addition to my mistake, there are no other reasons? If over 90% of the ordinary investors in more than 90% of the number of operations in both the case, then perhaps there is apart from my operation for reasons other than failure! What is the reason for it ... ...
A, you know your chip's "bottom line" do?
We know that, regardless of shares of listed companies Liu Tongpan Which extent of the distribution of its chips always been the hands of a listed company, retail only in listed companies reported quarterly, semi-annual report, annual reports of the time, in order to understand the "Top Ten in circulation the number of shareholders holding "and" number of shareholders, "while the distribution of the specific situation is seen. I remember in the last century, Shenzhen Shenzhen Stock Exchange has announced that she is the number of shares held by a different number of shareholders (ie, shares held by a number of people below the ,1-5, the number of shares, 10 million, 500 thousand, 1 million How many people ... ... the above), subject to retail investors generally welcomed, but only released one or two is no longer published.
Individual investors can not see, but the listed companies be able to see, a listed company can now buy their own shares, this information asymmetry existed inside; Since listed companies have their own schedule of distribution of the stock chips, then this strategic investment in listed companies persons, underwriters allotment, as well as top ten shareholders of tradable shares, and so is not difficult to see; if this "schedule" was only to master the stock market makers, then they could through a bargaining chip to make the changes in the distribution so that the vast majority of individual is bound to be taken in the Trader scheme!
I would like to separate ways the banker is not difficult to got to this "schedule", and since the Commission is not required for this "Schedule" absolute confidentiality of any of the provisions; we can not rule out an account that has been making big track, Once the individual can not be ruled out, "Many hands," the banker on the "backing off"!
To be sure, if an institution in determining the right before a stock PLAY, it is first listed company to go to the "research", "chips distribution" must be "research" in the main content!
In a fair, just and open market, one in which tens of millions of people are also involved in the market, if you can not stop making chips control the distribution schedule, it should also allow individual investors to access the same information at any time!
I personally think that if a bargaining chip in the distribution of Which schedule of listed companies have been making mastered, then the terms for individual investors is very dangerous! You stand Ming Chu, he stood the dark, your every move to his "live", you can PK had him?
