Category: Money Tips Date: 2006-08-04
Our society is in transition, on many issues, relatively easy to extreme. Say, debating over the "loss of state assets," it, long ago, the community to defend the concept of state-owned assets is neither complete nor clear, hundreds of billions of state-owned assets in the loss of numb state quietly --- well, it would prevent the loss of state assetså–? can prevent the anti-forward again went to the other extreme, that is, the over-defense of the state-owned assets.
Yesterday, that by the "Super Girl" big money and the days entertainment bosses just to say "Li Yuchun is the state-owned assets": We are state-owned enterprises, do not rely on artists to make money, these artists are state-owned assets, sold them, is called the State-owned assets. Also in the discussion of today's media, "the captain resigned, having a loss of state assets," the subject: the national training a pilot, especially the captain took a long time and huge costs, with the development and expansion of China's aviation industry , the airlines have already started a "pilot battle", some airlines will pilot's job-hopping as a "loss of state assets," doing everything possible to set the threshold block.
Usually, we are in a negative sense, the use of "loss of state assets," the word when it comes to loss of state assets, the total corresponds to a weak identity and image of the victim --- but in the "Li Yuchun is the state-owned assets" and the "pilots are state-owned assets "discourse, we will see a tough, domineering, exclusive image of the state-owned assets. Put the image of overseas-funded, not trying to defend anything, but rather a privilege. Said, "Li Yuchun is a state-owned assets," is nothing more than high-sounding entertainment company some time ago for the days lot of heated discussions of the eight-year contract overlord defense in order to ease pressure of public opinion; and that pilots are state-owned assets "is a clear-cut in order to prevent the pilot contract Overlord the market freedom of movement.
This is a very tricky thing, this is a defensive and negative sense of the word "Prevention of loss of state assets", now how to become a positive tool to assert privileges out? Is it because our country has been protected very well-funded regulatory system, such as the iron wall, "anti-drain" concept enjoys popular support, as well as to the extent of harsh? If so, why would an annual loss of so many state-owned assets, why elite collusion scandal plundering of state assets still continue to appear?
Reflect on these issues, we have seen two faces of state-owned assets, split: one face to the insiders, it is the weak image, because of the absence of regulatory system, state-owned assets often become the object of being carved up and plunder; a face to the the outsider, it is the powerful image, because the policy of protection, is often a symbol of privilege, hung with the reputation of state-owned assets, which means the priority was the protection of monopoly status, the right to enjoy all kinds of subsidies. In the division two faces, the state-owned assets are sometimes defensive shield, can be defense, "rich and powerful eating into" the fragile; sometimes offensive spear, in the dispense privileges extremely tough and overbearing.
Clearly, the days entertainment chiefs said that Li Yuchun is a state-owned assets, the airline said the pilot is a state-owned assets is an internal one to stand out propaganda at home when the attitude is to state-owned assets as a spear, is advocating a privilege --- As these state-owned enterprises Internally, the system of internal entitled to dispose of assets, whether the person so strictly, the internal person has a "What is the state-owned assets, and therefore can not be translated into private" concept, who do not know! Loss occurred only after the state-owned assets only another face to emerge.
It is this split has led to the continuous loss of state-owned assets, but also led to market-oriented reproached. Indeed, the loss of hundreds of billions of state assets has sounded the alarm against the loss, the "prevention of loss of state assets" philosophy continue to be strengthened. But we also found that in many cases this idea has been alienated as an excuse to assert privilege, emphasizing what is state-owned assets, not defend anything, but what it stood for. If you want to be truly effective in preventing loss of state assets, sincerely adhere to market rules, it should be the reverse of the two faces: Domestically, tough, that is, to strengthen internal supervision over; opening, that is, according to market principles so that elements flow.
Only the face powerful internal, state funding will not drain! After all, at this stage, the internal talent is the greatest threat to loss of state assets.
Hot Articles Latest Articles Stock joke: ancient and modern masters of speculative philosophy of laughter commentary tradable stay away from drugs, away from the beautiful stock warrants it: shake off the dust pretty shares it: the myth is the founder of T +0 poppy
* Expose the "black mouth" rating on several deceptive tactics beautiful stock it: the stock market myth of the founder of Life: the stock market to continue to adjust upward pressure on generals, three-line: Looking for winter planting the seeds away from drugs, away from the C of E nice share it: shake off the dust
